The indigenous nationalities of
The National Organization is the result of a long process which is worth
reviewing from a distance in order to better understand where we have come from
and where we are going.
CONAIE was formed out of the union of two already existing organizations,
ECUARUNARI and CONFENIAIE. ECUARUNARI, the regional organization of the Sierra
that has been functioning for over 20 years, and the Confederation of Indigenous
Nationalities of the Ecuadorian Amazon(CONFENIAE), formed in 1980, created that
same year the National Coordinating Council of the Indigenous Nationalities of
Ecuador, CONACNIE. CONACNIE was the center of long discussions to clarify the
terms and objectives of the movement. We could see what united us and what
separated us. For example, languages separated us, but the problems we shared
united us: the lack of land, racial discrimination, lack of bilingual
education, and above all, the need to have our own voice.
After that necessary step of coming to the most elemental agreements, the
next step was the legal constitution of a national organization to represent
all of us, including the indigenous people of the coast, through the formation
of their regional organization, COICE.
The legalization of the organization, and obtaining a physical space from
which to work, have greatly facilitated the process of the consolidation of
CONAIE.
At the moment of the formation of our organization, we had two urgent
tasks: land and education. Along with the resolution of the many land problems
that have been waiting for years, we pushed for the bilingual education program
to be organized by CONAIE. We succeeded in signing an agreement between CONAIE
and the Ministry of Education and Culture that is still functioning today. In
this way we have been able to unify the Quichua language, and we now want to
carry this project further with other indigenous languages.
Within our movement we have been carrying on discussions to define terms
such as nationality, Peoples, 'campesinos', Indians, indigenous. We have also
come to differentiate the meaning of land and territory for indigenous peoples.
The debates are continuing to clarify these concepts.
These discussions have contributed to a growing sense of self-
identification, and of pride in belonging to a people. This is reflected as
well in the understanding of the rest of the nation when they no longer, out of
ignorance, use pejorative terms such as aucas when referring the Huaorani,
jibaros when referring to the Shuar, colorados instead of Tsachilas, or cayapas
instead of Chachi. The word Indian is still used in general, but there will
come a time when each nationality will be referred to by its own name.
We also recognize that CONAIE has been developed with too much influence
from the structure of labor unions or interest groups, but since we have come
to realize that this structure does not respond to our needs, or our
traditional ways of organizing, we are searching for work methods that
faithfully reflect our own manner of arriving at consensus. The base
organizations make decisions and the leadership of CONAIE serves as an
intermediary between those decisions and the actions taken.
Examples of this style of working are the Indian Uprising of June, 1990,
and the Indigenous March by OPIP in April of this year, which was supported not
only by the indigenous communities in
Cuestiones de América Nš 7, Noviembre de 2001
Regresar a la
Página Principal...